Among the many misconceptions about ethics is the notion that they are entirely subjective and that there are no objective moral truths. While there is certainly diversity in ethical views across cultures and individuals, this doesn't mean ethics is purely relative or that we can't reason about ethical questions. Moral intuitions are not only widespread, but remarkably consistent across individuals and cultures. Even though social ethics have indeed evolved over time, the core moral precepts such as the sanctity of life, truth and peaceful coexistence have remained unchanged throughout history. The widespread nature of these intuitions suggests there may be some objective basis to ethics.
Life is a continuous journey where present decisions shape our future for generations to come. Ethics is the simplest formula that humanity has evolved to abide by, to preserve itself. In that sense, they are essential for our long-term survival as a species because all our actions have long-term consequences. While some choices may seem beneficial in the moment, they can lead to negative outcomes over time. The purpose of ethics is to guide our decision-making, ensuring that our immediate actions align with our long-term values and preserve our integrity as individuals and as a species. By considering the extended impact of our choices, ethics helps us navigate the complex interplay between short-term desires and long-term well-being, both for ourselves and for society.
Despite the universality of core ethical principles, there is certainly variations between cultures and epochs in history that we cannot ignore. Here again, we cannot remain neutral about these differences either. Instead, we must evaluate ethical frameworks for internal consistency and logical coherence. A system that leads to contradictions or absurd conclusions can be rationally critiqued based on the real-world consequences of ethical beliefs and actions. An ethical system that leads to widespread suffering could be objectively critiqued on those grounds.
Philosophers use hypothetical scenarios to test moral intuitions and reasoning. An ethical framework does not guarantee a correct answer for every question we may face. For example, the trolley problem reveals complexities in how we weigh lives and intentions.
Some argue that basic moral instincts evolved because they promoted survival and cooperation. This could provide an objective grounding for the universality of core ethical principles, but they don’t necessarily mean that the core values of those societies are necessarily alike. Different philosophical traditions and cultures often arrive at similar ethical conclusions through varied reasoning paths. This convergence may point to foundational truths about the human condition. Societies have made what many consider to be moral progress over time (e.g. abolition of slavery, universal human rights) that point to both the political progress we have made over time as well as the persistence of the elements of human nature that made unjust institutions possible in the first place. Arguably, the proclamation of universal human rights has not guaranteed access to those rights for every individual; the same way that slavery persists in many forms even to this day.
All things considered, ‘ethics’ remains an open question about how we may aspire to prevail as individuals, institutions, as communities and as humanity. Given how flawed and fallible we are, the eternal truths that inform the core ethical principles remain our best hope of surviving as a species. Given that we no longer tolerate slavery when we identify it and enjoy freedoms that many of our forefathers may not even have been able to dream of, we may even cautiously assume that we are progressing towards a far-off, wholesome ideal. But the history of humanity has never been a steady march of improvement or a linier progress towards Utopia, but one of persistence and courage in the face of constant setbacks, made possible by a collective desire to live ‘well-lived’ lives. And that is the question at the heart of ethics – how to live good and meaningful lives.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is one of the most influential works in Western moral philosophy. Here's a detailed summary of its key points:
The Highest Good and Happiness (Eudaimonia):
Aristotle begins by discussing the concept of the highest good, which he identifies as happiness (eudaimonia).
He argues that happiness is the ultimate goal of human life and activity.
Happiness is not just a feeling, but a state of well-being and flourishing.
Virtue Ethics:
Aristotle develops a system of virtue ethics, focusing on the character of the moral agent rather than just their actions.
He argues that to achieve eudaimonia, one must live a life of virtue.
Intellectual and Moral Virtues:
Aristotle distinguishes between intellectual virtues (e.g., wisdom, intelligence) and moral virtues (e.g., courage, temperance).
Intellectual virtues are developed through instruction, while moral virtues are developed through habit and practice.
The Doctrine of the Mean:
Aristotle proposes that each moral virtue is a mean between two vices of excess and deficiency.
For example, courage is a mean between cowardice (deficiency) and recklessness (excess).
This doesn't imply mediocrity, but rather the appropriate response in a given situation.
Practical Wisdom (Phronesis):
Aristotle emphasizes the importance of practical wisdom, the ability to make good judgments in particular situations.
This intellectual virtue is crucial for applying moral virtues correctly.
Voluntary and Involuntary Actions:
Aristotle discusses the nature of voluntary and involuntary actions to establish the basis for moral responsibility.
He argues that we are responsible for voluntary actions and that our character is shaped by the choices we make.
Friendship and Social Relationships:
Aristotle devotes significant attention to friendship, which he sees as essential for eudaimonia.
He distinguishes between friendships of utility, pleasure, and virtue, with the latter being the highest form.
Justice:
Aristotle explores different conceptions of justice, including distributive and corrective justice.
He sees justice as a complete virtue in relation to others.
Pleasure and the Good Life:
While not the highest good, Aristotle argues that pleasure has a role in the good life when it accompanies virtuous activities.
Contemplation as the Highest Activity:
Aristotle concludes that the highest form of happiness comes from contemplation (theoria), as it is the activity of the highest part of us (our rational faculty).
The Role of External Goods:
While virtue is central to happiness, Aristotle acknowledges that some external goods (e.g., health, wealth) are necessary for complete eudaimonia.
Ethics and Politics:
Aristotle sees ethics as part of political science, arguing that the good of the individual is intrinsically linked to the good of the city-state.
Moral Education:
Aristotle emphasizes the importance of proper education and habituation from youth to develop virtuous character.
Akrasia (Weakness of Will):
Aristotle discusses the phenomenon of akrasia, where individuals act against their better judgment, and explores its causes and potential remedies.
The Golden Mean in Practice:
Throughout the work, Aristotle applies his doctrine of the mean to various virtues, providing practical guidance on how to cultivate these virtues in daily life.
It's worth noting that Aristotle's work is rich in detail and nuance, with many subtle arguments and examples throughout. His ethical framework has had a profound and lasting impact on moral philosophy, influencing thinkers for over two millennia.